This article gives information on effective communication during appointments with medical and other treatment providers, but is not designed to be a substitute for legal advice. This area of law is complex, and you should consult with an attorney to address your specific concerns.
- What is effective communication?
- What are auxiliary aids and services?
- Do I have the right to have a sign language interpreter or other auxiliary aids or services during appointments with my doctor and other treatment providers?
- What laws protect my right to effective communication during my medical appointments?
- Do these laws apply to my doctor and other treatment providers?
- Do I have the right to a sign language interpreter or other auxiliary aids during my child's appointments if my child can hear and I am deaf?
- Do I have the right to choose the kind of auxiliary aid I prefer?
- Do I have the right to a certified sign language interpreter?
- My doctor has a small medical practice. Do these laws apply?
- Can my doctor make me use a family member as a sign language interpreter?
- Can my doctor deny me a sign language interpreter during my medical appointments if lip reading and written notes work just as well?
- Can my doctor charge me the cost of a sign language interpreter?
- My doctor complains that a sign language interpreter costs more than my doctor is paid for my medical appointment. Can my doctor refuse to pay?
- Does my doctor have to pay a sign language interpreter for every one of my medical appointments?
- What can I do if my doctor refuses to pay for a sign language interpreter or other auxiliary aid?
- How do I file an administrative complaint against my doctor?
- How much time do I have to file an administrative complaint against my doctor?
- Can I sue my doctor in court if he refuses to pay for a sign language interpreter?
- How much time do I have to file a lawsuit in court against my doctor?
- Do I have to file an administrative complaint first before I can file a lawsuit?
- Can I sue my doctor for money damages?
Updated February 2017
Communication with your treatment provider is effective communication when you can communicate with, receive information from, and convey information to, the treatment provider. Covered entities must provide auxiliary aids and services, such as a sign language interpreter, when needed to communicate effectively with people who have communication disabilities. In order to be effective, the auxiliary aid or service must be provided in accessible formats, in a timely manner, and in such a way as to protect the privacy and independence of the individual with a disability. The goal is to ensure that communication with people with these disabilities is equally effective as communication with people without disabilities.
Auxiliary aids are tools necessary to assure people with sensory, communication and other impairments an equal opportunity to benefit from a service. An auxiliary aid or service includes qualified interpreters, transcription services, captioning, written materials, assistive listening devices and systems, or any other effective method of making aurally heard materials accessible to an individual who is deaf or hard of hearing. An auxiliary aid or service does not include personal items such as a hearing aid or cochlear implant. Auxiliary aid or service may be necessary to properly diagnose, treat and obtain informed consent from some patients who are deaf or hard of hearing. Without auxiliary aids, doctors and medical staff may not understand the patient's report of symptoms, may misdiagnose the patient's medical problem, and may prescribe the wrong and even harmful treatment.
See also: Sign Language Interpreters and Auxiliary Aids and Services
Do I have the right to have a sign language interpreter or other auxiliary aids or services during appointments with my doctor and other treatment providers?
You have the right to effective communication between you and your treatment providers. The key to deciding what aid or service is needed to communicate effectively is to consider the nature, length, complexity, and context of the communication, as well as your normal method(s) of communication. For example, your doctor should use a sign language interpreter to explain a new medication, treatment or procedure, or to obtain your informed consent.
If possible, in order to ensure that arrangements can be made for your appointment, you can request an auxiliary aid or service in advance.
Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and Chapter 4112 of the Ohio Revised Code (Ohio's civil rights law) prohibit discrimination based on disability. Under these laws you have the right to the same access and quality of service that hearing patients receive. These laws give you the right to a sign language interpreter during some, though not all, appointments. The following FAQs will refer to these laws as "the ADA," "Section 504" and "Chapter 4112."
Yes. The ADA and Chapter 4112 apply to places of public accommodation like stores, restaurants, libraries and hospitals. Your doctor's office and other treatment providers' offices where clients are received are places of public accommodation, and so the ADA and Chapter 4112 apply to your doctor and other providers. Section 504 applies to providers who receive federal funds like Medicaid and Medicare. Even if your provider receives federal funds for only one patient, Section 504 applies to your provider's treatment of all other patients.
Do I have the right to a sign language interpreter or other auxiliary aids during my child's appointments if my child can hear and I am deaf?
You have the right to effective communication, equal access and equal quality of service from your child's provider. Your child's provider must assure you the same access and quality of service that any other child's parent receives. Effective communication of new and complicated information about your child's treatment, for example, requires an accommodation.
No. Your doctor is allowed to choose a form of auxiliary aid which your doctor believes will assure effective communication with you. However, your doctor should consult with you about which form of auxiliary aid works best for you.
No. Although there are national accreditation and certification bodies for sign language interpreters, your doctor is not required to provide an accredited or certified sign language interpreter. If a sign language interpreter is necessary to assure you effective communication and equal access and quality of service, your doctor is only required to provide you a sign language interpreter who is qualified according to the standards of the profession.
Yes. These laws apply to both large and small medical practices. Exclusion, denial of services, segregation and different treatment because of disability are prohibited by these laws. The ADA requires medical practices of all sizes to provide auxiliary aids and services, like sign language interpreters, that are necessary to assure equal access and quality of service and effective communication. Section 504 excuses small medical practices with fewer than fifteen employees from this requirement to provide auxiliary aids and services, although obligations under the ADA still apply. Also, the laws do not require medical practices to bear undue cost and administrative burdens.
No. Family members may not have the expertise or may be too emotionally involved to assure effective communication between you and your doctor, and they may compromise your right to privacy. Your doctor should discuss with you which sign language interpreter or other auxiliary aid works best for you.
Can my doctor deny me a sign language interpreter during my medical appointments if lip reading and written notes work just as well?
Yes, but only if lip reading and written notes would assure effective communication during a particular appointment. For persons who use lip reading regularly or read and understand print well, lip reading and written notes may assure effective communication during some appointments. However, lip reading and written notes are not always effective to communicate large amounts of detailed and complicated information. Lip reading may only captures a small percentage of spoken content. Written notes may be too slow, incomplete, and inaccurate to keep up with the discussion, and may be too different from American Sign Language and other signed language for some deaf people to recognize. Lip reading and written notes may assure effective communication for some appointments and not for others. The communication method should be chosen according to the nature and purpose of each appointment.
No. Under the federal laws (ADA and Section 504), if a sign language interpreter is necessary to assure you effective communication and provide you equal access and quality of services, your doctor must pay for the sign language interpreter. Your doctor is not allowed to bill you for that expense. Ohio's law (Chapter 4112) does not require places of public accommodation like your doctor's office to pay for a sign language interpreter and other auxiliary aids. However, Ohio law prohibits discrimination based on disability in the form of denied access to treatment. In some cases the refusal to pay for a sign language interpreter effectively denies access to a person who is deaf or hard of hearing, and could violate Ohio law.
My doctor complains that a sign language interpreter costs more than my doctor is paid for my medical appointment. Can my doctor refuse to pay?
No. If a sign language interpreter is necessary to provide you equal access and quality of care, and necessary to assure you effective communication, your doctor must pay the sign language interpreter even if that appointment is financially a net loss to your doctor's practice. Your doctor is not, however, required to bear an undue burden or to fundamentally alter your doctor's medical practice. For example, a payment may be considered an undue burden or fundamental alteration if it would cause your doctor to go bankrupt or go out of business. A loss on a single appointment or even providing ongoing care for a patient does not establish an undue burden or fundamental alteration. The overall financial circumstances of your doctor's practice must be considered.
No. Your doctor has to pay only for those appointments where a sign language interpreter is necessary to provide you equal access and quality of service, and to assure you effective communication.
If you believe your doctor has discriminated against you because of your disability by refusing to provide or pay for a sign language interpreter necessary to assure you effective communication, you have the right to file complaints with administrative agencies and to file lawsuits in federal or state court.
The U.S. Department of Justice receives complaints of violations of the ADA and Section 504:
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Disability Rights Section, NYA
Washington, DC 20530
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services also receives complaints of violations of Section 504:
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Office for Civil Rights
Centralized Case Management Operations
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Room 509F HHH Bldg.
Washington, D.C. 20201
File a complaint: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/civilrights/complaints/index.html
Although Ohio's civil rights law does not require your doctor to provide auxiliary aids, there may be some other basis for a discrimination complaint. The Ohio Civil Rights Commission receives complaints of violations of Ohio's civil rights law:
Ohio Civil Rights Commission
Rhodes State Office Tower
30 East Broad Street, 5th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215
Phone: 614-466-2785 Fax: 614-644-8776
You have 180 days after the act of discrimination to file a complaint with the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. You have six months after the act of discrimination to file a complaint with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission. If you wait longer than those time periods, you may lose your right to file a complaint with these agencies. There is no set timeline for filing an ADA Title III administrative complaint with the U.S. Department of Justice, but you should file your complaint as quickly as possible.
Yes. You have the right to file lawsuits in state and federal courts under the ADA, Section 504 and Chapter 4112.
In Ohio, you have two years to file a lawsuit under federal law (ADA and Section 504), and six years to file a lawsuit under Ohio state law. If you wait longer than these times, you may lose your right to file a lawsuit. You are not required to have an attorney to file a lawsuit, but Disability Rights Ohio recommends that you consult an attorney as soon as possible to protect your rights.
No. You are not required to first file an administrative complaint before you file a lawsuit in court. You may file an administrative complaint, or a lawsuit, or both.
The ADA typically only allows courts to award injunctive relief, but compensatory damages may be awarded under Title II in some limited circumstances. Injunctive relief is a court order to take a specific action. For example, the court could order your doctor to pay for a sign language interpreter. Section 504 allows courts to award both compensatory and punitive damages. Compensatory damages are awarded to compensate or pay you for your losses or suffering, and punitive damages are awarded to punish a doctor or medical practice for discriminating against you. Under federal law, the court may also award attorney’s fees.